Fantasy-Football.DE

Normale Version: [NSFF] Liga-Ratings 2009
Du siehst gerade eine vereinfachte Darstellung unserer Inhalte. Normale Ansicht mit richtiger Formatierung.
Basierend auf den Angaben bei den Previews der jeweiligen Paarungen können bestimmte Ratings angegeben werden. Leider kann man sie nirgendwo in der Engine finden, also habe ich sie per Hand gemacht.
Hier sind die Ratings nach Woche 5:

Coach Rating:

1. Küppersteger Titanen 94
2. Marburg Crusaders 92
3. Lichtenberg Cowboys 91
4. Berlin Basher 91
5. Wiener Schnitzels 90
6. Hannover Broncos 90
7. Stockerau Bulldogs 87
8. Gehrden Warriors 86
9. Berlin Warriors 82
10. Rheine Bills 82
11. Steglitz Hawks 78
12. Red Mambas Hannover 76

Schedule Difficulty:

1. Rheine Bills
2. Stockerau Bulldogs
3. Gehrden Warriors
4. Wiener Schnitzels
4. Marburg Crusaders
4. Berlin Warriors
7. Lichtenberg Cowboys
7. Berlin Basher
9. Steglitz Hawks
10. Küppersteger Titanen
11. Hannover Broncos
12. Red Mambas Hannover

Passing:

1. Gehrden Warriors
2. Berlin Basher
3. Marburg Crusaders
4. Stockerau Bulldogs
5. Steglitz Hawks
6. Rheine Bills
7. Hannover Broncos
8. Lichtenberg Cowboys
9. Berlin Warriors
10. Red Mambas Hannover
11. Wiener Schnitzels
12. Küppersteger Titanen

Rushing:

1. Marburg Crusaders
2. Hannover Broncos
3. Gehrden Warriors
4. Red Mambas Hannover
5. Steglitz Hawks
6. Rheine Bills
7. Lichtenberg Cowboys
8. Wiener Schnitzels
9. Berlin Warriors
10. Stockerau Bulldogs
11. Berlin Basher
12. Küppersteger Titanen

Receiving:

1. Marburg Crusaders
2. Lichtenberg Cowboys
3. Berlin Basher
4. Red Mambas Hannover
5. Gehrden Warriors
6. Küppersteger Titanen
7. Berlin Warriors
8. Rheine Bills
9. Wiener Schnitzels
10. Steglitz Hawks
11. Hannover Broncos
12. Stockerau Bulldogs

Defense/ST:

1. Marburg Crusaders
2. Berlin Basher
3. Berlin Warriors
4. Stockerau Bulldogs
5. Hannover Broncos
6. Steglitz Hawks
7. Lichtenberg Cowboys
8. Red Mambas Hannover
9. Wiener Schnitzels
10. Gehrden Warriors
11. Küppersteger Titanen
12. Rheine Bills

What is the coach ranking:
The number of fantasy points this coach's team has scored this season, shown as a percentage of the maximum number of points the owner could have scored if that owner had started the highest scoring players each week. A good owner won't leave points on the bench!
Funny, a coach rating heavily influenced by luck and/or lack of quality depth...

Example 1: I have six 0pt scoring bench players, my coach rating = 100.
Example 2: I have four evenly productive RBs, my coach rating = 75 (based on probability of who will perform best each week)
Example 3: My superstar shoe-in top performing RB gets injured and outscored by a bench warming FB who had one reception, my coach rating = 0.

But, it's still an interesting ranking...I'm just glad it's not used for draft order or tie-breakers Smile
Tja, für das Coach ranking kann man sich leider nichts kaufen. Das kommt halt zu Stande wenn auf der bench fast auf der ganzen Linie 0 Punkte sitzen. :oops:
Perhaps something was lost in google translation, but I wasn't trying to imply anything about the way we are managing our teams. I was merely commenting on the idea of coach ratings based on points from the bench, taking into account the amount of luck fantasy football involves.

I also think the ranking is funny because I'm in 11th place in the league standings but these rankings show I'm the 5th ranked coach (tied for fifth). Decent coach and a bad team, or just plain bad luck in weekly matchups? It doesn't matter, I'm in 11TH! :x